Skip to Content


Gallery / Farwoods Design« previous | next »

Farwoods Design image

Farwoods Design

Current rating: 5.6 (452 votes)

(you have already voted for this entry)

  • Added: 10 January 2005

Review:

It took a couple of views before I decided to add the farwoods design site to the gallery. I don't know - it's just a really solid site with some great standards-compilant coding and nice visual touches. It looks pretty standard at first, but there is a lot of nifty details going on under the hood. Super-clean, valid markup with a well executed accessabiliy effort and I also believe that the xhtml content is served with the correct mime-type. The overall design impression is not wildly innovative, but it stays out of the way and gives a pleasant overall browsing experience. Those rollover-dropshadows looks quite familiar though... Great job.

Reviewed by David Hellsing

There are 8 guest comments so far.

commentat 01:55 on 10 January 2005, bob wrote:

(comment deleted by admin)

commentat 11:09 on 10 January 2005, nick wrote:

Its a nice site but for me it's too close to http://www.fortymedia.com/ to be counted as an original design

commentat 11:40 on 10 January 2005, admin wrote:

(Previous discussion continued . Please post only comments related to the site in question in here. For the last time.)

commentat 14:12 on 10 January 2005, dan wrote:

Alright being constructive then, the layout does resemble 40 media and the drop shadow image on the left does look familiar. But still it is a solid design, I would have to say that the main navigation doesn't stand out enough.

commentat 18:42 on 26 January 2005, Scott Johnson wrote:

This is indeed a nice site, but it seems that there is something that is just not quite right about it. I can't quite put a finger on it, but there's something that I just don't like. I still give it an 8, though.

commentat 00:06 on 27 January 2005, Bryan wrote:

I like the site overall. I think the layout works well. I do think that the large image on the left is a bit distracting to me and isn't too interesting as a photo. The colors work well. I think the headers look nice, but the rest of the typography is bland. It gets a 6 from me.

commentat 03:07 on 13 March 2005, Lyndon wrote:

On the surface the design looks good. It sets some sort of expectation, however I feel that the expectation is as clouded as the central focus of the homepage. "What am I supposed to be doing here?" - design is about direction and directing - this is not very obvious here. I find that the flow of movement does not have a harmony. I don't think that the overall execution was done very well. This barely scrapes through, because it's painstakingly designed, but without a global vision. A 5.

commentat 01:55 on 31 August 2005, bjorn wrote:

Green is my favourite color combination i think... (when uset with itself that is)... me like!


Gallery by month:

Gallery by rating:

Gallery All Stars:

Comments / recent

About dan friml: The layout is good and also cplors are pretty.... [more]

About dan friml: looks like photoshop barfed on a canvas. The way h... [more]

About dan friml: Bellissima l'immagine relativa al logo di Artworks... [more]

About dan friml: Overall a nice looking site. Two points of improve... [more]

About dan friml: This design definitely brings something to the tab... [more]


Search

Features

Stylegala BookStore
The Stylegala BookStore has a massive archive of great books for you as a professional..
Bullet madness
Bullet madness is a list of 200 bullets, arrows and icons uploaded by our users.
CSS Reference
An alphabetical list over the most common CSS1 and CSS2 syntax and properties.

Sponsors

Logo design for $149

Advertise here