Gallery / Farwoods Design« previous | next »
Farwoods Design
Current rating: 5.6 (452 votes)
(you have already voted for this entry)
- Added: 10 January 2005
Review:
It took a couple of views before I decided to add the farwoods design site to the gallery. I don't know - it's just a really solid site with some great standards-compilant coding and nice visual touches. It looks pretty standard at first, but there is a lot of nifty details going on under the hood. Super-clean, valid markup with a well executed accessabiliy effort and I also believe that the xhtml content is served with the correct mime-type. The overall design impression is not wildly innovative, but it stays out of the way and gives a pleasant overall browsing experience. Those rollover-dropshadows looks quite familiar though... Great job.
Reviewed by David Hellsing
There are 8 guest comments so far.
Gallery by month:
- August 2008 [1]
- July 2008 [1]
- June 2008 [3]
- February 2008 [1]
- January 2008 [1]
- December 2007 [1]
- October 2007 [2]
- September 2007 [1]
- July 2007 [2]
- June 2007 [1]
- May 2007 [3]
- April 2007 [1]
- March 2007 [3]
- February 2007 [2]
- January 2007 [4]
- December 2006 [3]
- November 2006 [3]
- October 2006 [3]
- September 2006 [3]
- August 2006 [3]
- June 2006 [5]
- May 2006 [1]
- April 2006 [1]
- March 2006 [2]
- February 2006 [1]
- January 2006 [3]
- December 2005 [3]
- November 2005 [3]
- October 2005 [3]
- September 2005 [6]
- August 2005 [7]
- July 2005 [9]
- June 2005 [7]
- May 2005 [9]
- April 2005 [12]
- March 2005 [20]
- February 2005 [6]
- January 2005 [7]
- December 2004 [9]
- November 2004 [14]
- October 2004 [14]
- September 2004 [15]
- August 2004 [24]
Gallery by rating:
Gallery All Stars:
- 02.2008 | Satsu Design
- 01.2008 | FortySeven Media
- 12.2007 | Biola Undergrad
- 12.2007 | Marius Roosendaal
- 10.2007 | Marius Roosendaal
- 09.2007 | Cravattificio.com
- 07.2007 | Rikcat Industries
- 06.2007 | Team Viget
- 05.2007 | Oxford Hotel
- 04.2007 | the Geniant Blog
- 03.2007 | Dept. of Spanish & Portuguese, UC Berkeley
- 02.2007 | A-Film
- 01.2007 | nonstep radio
- 12.2006 | Word Of Sport Bookshop
- 11.2006 | Syd Lieberman
- 10.2006 | C-Ville
- 09.2006 | Yes Insurance
- 08.2006 | Exozet
- 06.2006 | Hellgate: London
- 05.2006 | Dalit Freedom Network
- 04.2006 | Jakub Krčmář
- 03.2006 | Veerle's Blog
- 02.2006 | UX Magazine
- 01.2006 | E-knjige.net
- 12.2005 | The John Carroll School
- 11.2005 | Kutztown University
- 10.2005 | 31Three
- 09.2005 | Derek Powazek
- 08.2005 | A List Apart
- 07.2005 | Avalonstar
- 06.2005 | 9rules
- 05.2005 | folietto
- 04.2005 | web.burza - Superhero Edition
- 03.2005 | Joshuaink
- 02.2005 | Brother Jones Artwork
- 01.2005 | badboy.media.design
- 12.2004 | Mezzoblue
- 11.2004 | Shaun of the dead
- 10.2004 | Hicksdesign
- 09.2004 | Small Transport
- 08.2004 | Justwatchthesky
Comments / recent
About dan friml: The layout is good and also cplors are pretty....
[more]
About dan friml: looks like photoshop barfed on a canvas. The way h...
[more]
About dan friml: Bellissima l'immagine relativa al logo di Artworks...
[more]
About dan friml: Overall a nice looking site. Two points of improve...
[more]
About dan friml: This design definitely brings something to the tab...
[more]
Search
Features
- Stylegala BookStore
- The Stylegala BookStore has a massive archive of great books for you as a professional..
- Bullet madness
- Bullet madness is a list of 200 bullets, arrows and icons uploaded by our users.
- CSS Reference
- An alphabetical list over the most common CSS1 and CSS2 syntax and properties.
Sponsors


(comment deleted by admin)
Its a nice site but for me it's too close to http://www.fortymedia.com/ to be counted as an original design
(Previous discussion continued . Please post only comments related to the site in question in here. For the last time.)
Alright being constructive then, the layout does resemble 40 media and the drop shadow image on the left does look familiar. But still it is a solid design, I would have to say that the main navigation doesn't stand out enough.
This is indeed a nice site, but it seems that there is something that is just not quite right about it. I can't quite put a finger on it, but there's something that I just don't like. I still give it an 8, though.
I like the site overall. I think the layout works well. I do think that the large image on the left is a bit distracting to me and isn't too interesting as a photo. The colors work well. I think the headers look nice, but the rest of the typography is bland. It gets a 6 from me.
On the surface the design looks good. It sets some sort of expectation, however I feel that the expectation is as clouded as the central focus of the homepage. "What am I supposed to be doing here?" - design is about direction and directing - this is not very obvious here. I find that the flow of movement does not have a harmony. I don't think that the overall execution was done very well. This barely scrapes through, because it's painstakingly designed, but without a global vision. A 5.
Green is my favourite color combination i think... (when uset with itself that is)... me like!