Skip to Content


Gallery / International Christian Response« previous | next »

International Christian Response image

International Christian Response

Current rating: 5.4 (322 votes)

(you have already voted for this entry)

Review:

There’s a lot going on with this site’s design and I’m torn when it comes to evaluating it. On the one hand, the design is, contextually, pretty good for an organization meant to garner interest and support. The design grabs the eyes and the heavy dose of hover-state interactivity (not seen by those using MSIE) on the page piques curiosity and helps to spur interest. On the other hand, the heavy use of imagery and the broad color palette is rather busy, perhaps bordering on visual input overload.

I find it interesting that while the main content area has a typical, subdued color scheme, the sidebar elements are brought more to the fore by the excited use of color. Again, I’m not sure if this contrast helps the page design succeed or merely muddles things up, from a usability standpoint.

There are certainly some issues with the markup and validation in this site. Some problems are absolutely needless (“border” element in images??) and some more complicated (character encoding conflicts). However, the W3C tools are not at all above dishing erroneous readings and questionable interpretations.

In the end, I have to say that I personally enjoy the design and the interaction presented by this site. The design and layout enjoys a detailed touch and the use of color and the sidebar element theme distracts from the fact that the layout is yet another blog-style, 2-column scheme. I’m not a fan of the page background color, but I’m sure that this design is one that will have plenty of fans and detractors. That’s what happens when chances are taken with design choices.

Reviewed by Andy Rutledge

There are 5 guest comments so far.

commentat 00:50 on 23 March 2005, Colly wrote:

Not had time to delve into the code, but the use of rollovers is great, the single-character icons in the sidebar are very clean and print-design-esque, and it looks solid... but all the good work seems compromised by the inappropriate torn edges and their close proximity to the content. It all seems so "almost". A little more spacing and room for content to breathe and I think I'd enjoy it more.

commentat 02:49 on 23 March 2005, Lin wrote:

I feel the background detracts from the overall design..to me, it just doesn't fit.

commentat 03:00 on 23 March 2005, Raven wrote:

A bit inspired by this http://www.csszengarden.com/index.php?cssfile=/118/118.css&page= probably, but that's not a bad thing.

Looks pretty cool. I especially like the header and the rollovers on the sidebar.

The code looks OK, but I would prefer if there were less divs... And the footer located in the middle looks really weird, could've been done better.

Overall good job!

commentat 09:11 on 23 March 2005, excargot wrote:

clear and well structured...and yes the background is strange compared to the rest of the site.

commentat 05:19 on 27 March 2005, Adam Bramwell wrote:

Another site that has a 'turn styles off' link. After an exhausting cost-benefit analysis, Honestly I can't see the point of these things.


Gallery by month:

Gallery by rating:

Gallery All Stars:

Comments / recent

About dan friml: This site is the abomination of what Stylegala is ... [more]

About dan friml: The layout is good and also cplors are pretty.... [more]

About dan friml: looks like photoshop barfed on a canvas. The way h... [more]

About dan friml: Bellissima l'immagine relativa al logo di Artworks... [more]

About dan friml: Overall a nice looking site. Two points of improve... [more]


Search

Features

Stylegala BookStore
The Stylegala BookStore has a massive archive of great books for you as a professional..
Bullet madness
Bullet madness is a list of 200 bullets, arrows and icons uploaded by our users.
CSS Reference
An alphabetical list over the most common CSS1 and CSS2 syntax and properties.

Sponsors

Logo design for $149

Advertise here