Skip to Content


Gallery / Jeff Werner« previous | next »

Jeff Werner image

Jeff Werner

Current rating: 5.6 (408 votes)

(you have already voted for this entry)

Review:

I've loved this site since the first time I saw it -- which was quite a while ago, when it was first submitted. (I'm a bit behind on my posting.)

Too often, "minimalist" web design means that the designer slapped it together in a couple of hours and didn't have time to do anything nice with it. This definitely isn't the case here. It's apparent that Jeff has put a lot of thought into the details and layout of his site.

I think what I like best about this design is the use of columns. It's easy to fall into the trap of being clunky, symmetrical, and "bloglike," but Jeff manages to avoid that. By mixing up the column sizes, lengths, and positions, he creates an effect that is lively and organic. The column lengths don't match, but it appears that he's taken care to have it create an intentional "shape," rather than being haphazard.

The code loses a few points for some non-semantic/structural class and ID names (e.g., "b-right"), but wins those points back -- and then some -- for accesskey support, extensive use of link titles, avoidance of divitis, and the fact that it looks great with styles turned off.

Reviewed by James Archer

There are 9 guest comments so far.

commentat 07:55 on 12 June 2005, Matt Robin wrote:

This isn't lively OR organic (James) - too many lists of links across too many columns looks cluttered and disorganised.

Also, light colored fonts on white backgrounds should be banned! This makes the typography not a high enough contrast (especially on the smaller text).

I'm sure the site content is interesting enough, and Jeff has shown that he's put a lot of effort in to it.

Just alter the colors and drop the clunky column layout - and you'll have a neater site for it. :)

My first impression was 'Oh, it's just another blog' - and that's a shame. Jeff, I think your site has potential and you're a cool guy!

I have given it a 7.

commentat 13:29 on 12 June 2005, Fredrik wrote:

Love the layout. The scheme and design.

Like how some areas are removed out of focus through brighter text. Would like to see a solution to highlight or increase contrast on these though. The :hover doesn't make the right-hand list much easier to read for instance.

One thing though, that is of great concern is that I don't think the layout is correct for it's application. The site is supposed to be The personal journal and portfolio of Jeff Werner. But I generally get the impression of a larger organization. It's a very bussinesslike design. While nothing wrong with wanting to relay that it's your style, it feels like an awful lot of (sometimes redundant) information taking up valuable screenplace in order to deliver pretty basic information.

Of course it's all subjective. It's good that people dare to think outside the blog. I just don't get the feeling of this being a portfolio at all, or a journal either. It seems more like an brand-name portal...

commentat 17:52 on 12 June 2005, Kev wrote:

Key word to this design is the description of the site as a 'journal'. Thats _exactly_ the feel this design imparts to me. It makes me want to read more and that can only be a winning formula really. Nice one.

commentat 20:00 on 12 June 2005, Jeff Wheeler wrote:

I love the way he has managed to include four columns without it looking very cluttered. I also like the color scheme quite a bit.

On the right sidebars, many of the links could use some padding I feel, as they are quite smooshed. Also, the sub-headers aren't terribly elaborate (really, just a tiny font bolded).

I gave it a 7/10.

commentat 23:44 on 12 June 2005, Jeff Croft wrote:

This has also been one of my favorites ever since I saw it. The column layout is unique and interesting, and the flatness of the graphic design gives it a very print-like feel. I love it.

commentat 14:33 on 15 June 2005, Marco Douma wrote:

The design is done really well. Good information overview. A lot of information, but it doesn't feel as too much for the eye.

But it's a bit messy in IE 5.5 and before.

commentat 22:40 on 21 September 2005, Dan wrote:

My first attention was pointed on the 2 left columns, looks non ordinary, but are userfriendly in the same time. Nice content

commentat 11:11 on 22 September 2005, Adam wrote:

Besides all, I found plenty of useful information on the website, the website looks clean and interesting, good resource

commentat 23:11 on 08 October 2005, Stanislav wrote:

Clean designed, well stuctured, I like this website, the website proffesionally designed


Gallery by month:

Gallery by rating:

Gallery All Stars:

Comments / recent

About dan friml: The layout is good and also cplors are pretty.... [more]

About dan friml: looks like photoshop barfed on a canvas. The way h... [more]

About dan friml: Bellissima l'immagine relativa al logo di Artworks... [more]

About dan friml: Overall a nice looking site. Two points of improve... [more]

About dan friml: This design definitely brings something to the tab... [more]


Search

Features

Stylegala BookStore
The Stylegala BookStore has a massive archive of great books for you as a professional..
Bullet madness
Bullet madness is a list of 200 bullets, arrows and icons uploaded by our users.
CSS Reference
An alphabetical list over the most common CSS1 and CSS2 syntax and properties.

Sponsors

Logo design for $149

Advertise here