Skip to Content


Gallery / MacWorld« previous | next »

MacWorld image

MacWorld

Current rating: 5.4 (394 votes)

(you have already voted for this entry)

  • Added: 08 September 2004

Review:

Yet another large company goes standard, and thats a good trend. To my surpise, the design looks very un-mac. I didnt expect another apple.com design, but neither did I expect it to look so bloggish and earthy. The drop shadow is way too intense for my taste, and the colors makes me think more about gardening than hi-end mac hardware. Still, the site works fine and its easy to navigate and read. Some of the advertisement markup looks bad though and the logo should probably be clickable.

Reviewed by David Hellsing

There are 11 guest comments so far.

commentat 19:31 on 08 September 2004, Mr knoll wrote:

Yuck! This I didnt like. The text is too big and the site is just boring. Good content though

commentat 22:47 on 08 September 2004, Martin wrote:

Really rather messy, visually. One of those occasions where one questions the need for three columns. Needs tightening up.

Also, users with 800 x 600 displays are required to scroll horizontally to see the whole page. This could be avoided entirely with some liquidness in the layout.

The old-fashioned mark-up for the ads just serves to emphasise the scope for some polishing-up here.

commentat 03:41 on 09 September 2004, AmyO wrote:

Drop shadows for the sake of having drop shadows is becoming a pet peeve of mine. The shadow on the right side of the tan column makes no sense. It creates the illusion that it is a flap of paper attatched to the header and is lifting up. The layout is still cluttered, perhaps only slightly less so than before. I agree that the ads need to be changed to go with the new look.

commentat 04:40 on 09 September 2004, Dave wrote:

This is a good example of a standard, general public site that happens to be coded correctly. There is still good design in there - its not art though!

commentat 17:19 on 09 September 2004, Michael Pierce wrote:

The coding might be good (except for the ads) but the design is just too sloppy for me, especially for a company that employs designers. They'd never layout the magazine like this...

I agree that the dropshadows have been overused. The ones around the MacWorld logo bug me the most and the left nav is like an incomplete Escher drawing with a shadows along the sides but nothing at the top.

commentat 19:09 on 09 September 2004, Martin wrote:

Re: Drop Shadows

AmyO - you're so right. Unreasoned/ unreasonable drop shadows must go. It's details like this that help show the calibre of a design.

commentat 06:12 on 10 September 2004, Marc Broad wrote:

Hey lets keep the style in "style-gala". Otherwise change the name to "code gala".

Why fill up your entries with technically acceptable sites that look about as exciting as nail clipping?

There are a million blogs out there as good(?) as this ...

In fact - the thumbnail on this site is the best looking part about it ...

commentat 11:50 on 10 September 2004, stylegala wrote:

"Why fill up your entries with technically acceptable sites that look about as exciting as nail clipping?"

Marc: I agree that the redesign of macworld is a dissapointment in many ways. I still think its important to feature big companies who goes standard, and its good to discuss it. I could feature a zillion blogs that looks nice, but you've all seen them before havent you?

commentat 05:07 on 12 September 2004, Marc Broad wrote:

I commend & applaud companies wo go standards compliant.

A quote from your very own about page sums up my feelings however:

"We want to show you that good design and web standards are two sides of the same coin. Style gala aims not only to promote the finest and most beautiful websites that uses CSS and web standards"

I don't see "two side of the same coin" with this entry. Instead i see a website that wouldnt get a second look if it were anyone less important than

commentat 05:10 on 12 September 2004, Marc Broad wrote:

Cont - Mac World...

Ps - might want to strip the slashes out of the preview text area as it counts the slashes as part of the character limit my post above was cut short.

commentat 10:44 on 18 September 2004, nerdcool wrote:

I agree about the dropshadows being overused. I think the they are more annoying for being logically questionable than too strong. The tan column is raised to different heights if you follow the edges around. (although i think monc did a similar thing with )


Gallery by month:

Gallery by rating:

Gallery All Stars:

Comments / recent

About dan friml: The layout is good and also cplors are pretty.... [more]

About dan friml: looks like photoshop barfed on a canvas. The way h... [more]

About dan friml: Bellissima l'immagine relativa al logo di Artworks... [more]

About dan friml: Overall a nice looking site. Two points of improve... [more]

About dan friml: This design definitely brings something to the tab... [more]


Search

Features

Stylegala BookStore
The Stylegala BookStore has a massive archive of great books for you as a professional..
Bullet madness
Bullet madness is a list of 200 bullets, arrows and icons uploaded by our users.
CSS Reference
An alphabetical list over the most common CSS1 and CSS2 syntax and properties.

Sponsors

Logo design for $149

Advertise here