Skip to Content


Gallery / Subtraction« previous | next »

Subtraction image

Subtraction

Current rating: 6.0 (595 votes)

Thank you for your vote!

Review:

Wow. Khoi Vinh's latest incarnation of subtraction.com is just wonderful. All black & white and an impressive grid layout comes with web standards and CSS for layout. The site design very unique in it's swiss-styled grids and the solid layout skills makes up for the lack of colors. A few thoughts: the top logo should probably link to the home page instead of the current page, and a menu indicator of where you are would also be nice. But this is a fantastic site and an impressive way of doing complex grids in CSS. Happy new year!

Reviewed by David Hellsing

There are 17 guest comments so far.

commentat 12:39 on 03 January 2005, Mark Boulton wrote:

Superb - love it. It's great to correct usage of grids and typographic relationships in a CSS design. Gone are the grads and drop shadows - hope they don't come back for a while!

commentat 14:36 on 03 January 2005, Jimmy Nordlund wrote:

It looks quite a bit like the old version of the site (which isn't a bad thing), with the design fleshed out in the same kind of unique grid style manner. Haven't really made up my mind about the B&W thing though, a bit (but just a bit!) more color might not hurt. But all in all, excellent work. Very inspiring.

commentat 14:38 on 03 January 2005, Bryan wrote:

Thats a pretty nice site.

once I got deeper though, I felt like I couldn't focus on anything as there was ALOT of text on the page.

Obviously the site was designed for 1024 x 760 or higher as someone with 800 x 600 wouldn't even know there was content below the big picture.

Anyways, its a good site though. Good submission.

commentat 15:30 on 03 January 2005, Fernando Dunn II wrote:

I may be a bit biased since this is the type of incarnation that I was aiming for.

I think this design is awesome. Making the homepage different from the subpages makes it feel more welcoming. The navigation is simple, bold and to the point. The designer has created quite a unique top-to-bottom and left-to-right approach to the layout. Bad thing is that it may be a bit distracting also. Another thing I'm not feeling is the width. They might as well had stuck to 800px.

Love the black and w

commentat 16:24 on 03 January 2005, Kristopher wrote:

Deffinately did a good job with accessibility :p.

commentat 11:15 on 04 January 2005, Leeroy wrote:

Love it. This site is great to use and has some great features. Very classy!

commentat 12:13 on 04 January 2005, k. wrote:

Excellent usage of grid systems.

commentat 14:17 on 04 January 2005, Whinters wrote:

Hmmm.

Sorry everyone, but I'm going to jump off the bandwagon and admit that I can't see why this is being received so well *prepares for backlash*.

My first impression was that I was looking at the old "Orange" phone company website, and I agree with Bryan that once you get past the first 3 items, the amount of text (all placed at varying widths and indentations) makes it very confusing to follow.

It's nice but I just can't see it...

commentat 22:43 on 04 January 2005, Jason Santa Maria wrote:

I agree to a bit with that last comment. While this is a beautifully (and painstakingly) executed example of staunch grid design, I think that it suffers a bit from an organizational haze. Once you get further down the page past the nice elements like pictures that help your eye to break up the information into digestible chunks, you are left with a daunting amount of text. The grid helps, but this site could benefit from some good old design elbow grease like color, contrast, and hierarchy.

commentat 18:17 on 05 January 2005, Yuriy wrote:

Nice selection! I really love the feel and style.

commentat 15:09 on 06 January 2005, karen wrote:

(comment removed by admin)

commentat 14:50 on 07 January 2005, admin wrote:

The previous discussion is continued in the . Please post only comments related to the site in here and follow the guidelines stated under the comment field.

commentat 15:36 on 07 January 2005, Chris wrote:

Those of you who are complaining about "too much text"... Are you saying that he should write shorter articles? If you simply don't like reading long texts, you can hardly blame the designer. I mean, the quantity of text is not a design decision, it's an editorial choice.

The implication of such a critique is either that he should write more "bite-sized" articles (which is a writing critique, not design), or that the text layout should be paginated (which is really annoying).

commentat 20:20 on 07 January 2005, ass wrote:

(comment deleted by admin)

commentat 16:00 on 08 January 2005, admin wrote:

(Previous discussion continued even further )

commentat 13:39 on 01 March 2005, Jacob Rask wrote:

I've started reading his blog regularly now, and each time I read an entry I start by simply admiring the layout for a few seconds.

commentat 01:52 on 31 August 2005, bjorn wrote:

Powerful use of black.. i like it...


Gallery by month:

Gallery by rating:

Gallery All Stars:

Comments / recent

About dan friml: The layout is good and also cplors are pretty.... [more]

About dan friml: looks like photoshop barfed on a canvas. The way h... [more]

About dan friml: Bellissima l'immagine relativa al logo di Artworks... [more]

About dan friml: Overall a nice looking site. Two points of improve... [more]

About dan friml: This design definitely brings something to the tab... [more]


Search

Features

Stylegala BookStore
The Stylegala BookStore has a massive archive of great books for you as a professional..
Bullet madness
Bullet madness is a list of 200 bullets, arrows and icons uploaded by our users.
CSS Reference
An alphabetical list over the most common CSS1 and CSS2 syntax and properties.

Sponsors

Logo design for $149

Advertise here