Gallery / Villa Hotel Tamara« previous | next »
Villa Hotel Tamara
Current rating: 5.8 (457 votes)
(you have already voted for this entry)
- Added: 30 March 2005
- Designer: Deniz Arkan
- Submitter: Deniz Arkan
Review:
This represenation of the elegant boutique hotel in Turkey is "good-looking" with extraordinary photography and nice colors.
The simple navigation help visitors to find the information they are looking for without hassle. Take a look at the reservation form; nicely customized.
There are 13 guest comments so far.
Gallery by month:
- August 2008 [1]
- July 2008 [1]
- June 2008 [3]
- February 2008 [1]
- January 2008 [1]
- December 2007 [1]
- October 2007 [2]
- September 2007 [1]
- July 2007 [2]
- June 2007 [1]
- May 2007 [3]
- April 2007 [1]
- March 2007 [3]
- February 2007 [2]
- January 2007 [4]
- December 2006 [3]
- November 2006 [3]
- October 2006 [3]
- September 2006 [3]
- August 2006 [3]
- June 2006 [5]
- May 2006 [1]
- April 2006 [1]
- March 2006 [2]
- February 2006 [1]
- January 2006 [3]
- December 2005 [3]
- November 2005 [3]
- October 2005 [3]
- September 2005 [6]
- August 2005 [7]
- July 2005 [9]
- June 2005 [7]
- May 2005 [9]
- April 2005 [12]
- March 2005 [20]
- February 2005 [6]
- January 2005 [7]
- December 2004 [9]
- November 2004 [14]
- October 2004 [14]
- September 2004 [15]
- August 2004 [24]
Gallery by rating:
Gallery All Stars:
- 02.2008 | Satsu Design
- 01.2008 | FortySeven Media
- 12.2007 | Biola Undergrad
- 12.2007 | Marius Roosendaal
- 10.2007 | Marius Roosendaal
- 09.2007 | Cravattificio.com
- 07.2007 | Rikcat Industries
- 06.2007 | Team Viget
- 05.2007 | Oxford Hotel
- 04.2007 | the Geniant Blog
- 03.2007 | Dept. of Spanish & Portuguese, UC Berkeley
- 02.2007 | A-Film
- 01.2007 | nonstep radio
- 12.2006 | Word Of Sport Bookshop
- 11.2006 | Syd Lieberman
- 10.2006 | C-Ville
- 09.2006 | Yes Insurance
- 08.2006 | Exozet
- 06.2006 | Hellgate: London
- 05.2006 | Dalit Freedom Network
- 04.2006 | Jakub Krčmář
- 03.2006 | Veerle's Blog
- 02.2006 | UX Magazine
- 01.2006 | E-knjige.net
- 12.2005 | The John Carroll School
- 11.2005 | Kutztown University
- 10.2005 | 31Three
- 09.2005 | Derek Powazek
- 08.2005 | A List Apart
- 07.2005 | Avalonstar
- 06.2005 | 9rules
- 05.2005 | folietto
- 04.2005 | web.burza - Superhero Edition
- 03.2005 | Joshuaink
- 02.2005 | Brother Jones Artwork
- 01.2005 | badboy.media.design
- 12.2004 | Mezzoblue
- 11.2004 | Shaun of the dead
- 10.2004 | Hicksdesign
- 09.2004 | Small Transport
- 08.2004 | Justwatchthesky
Comments / recent
About dan friml: The layout is good and also cplors are pretty....
[more]
About dan friml: looks like photoshop barfed on a canvas. The way h...
[more]
About dan friml: Bellissima l'immagine relativa al logo di Artworks...
[more]
About dan friml: Overall a nice looking site. Two points of improve...
[more]
About dan friml: This design definitely brings something to the tab...
[more]
Search
Features
- Stylegala BookStore
- The Stylegala BookStore has a massive archive of great books for you as a professional..
- Bullet madness
- Bullet madness is a list of 200 bullets, arrows and icons uploaded by our users.
- CSS Reference
- An alphabetical list over the most common CSS1 and CSS2 syntax and properties.
Sponsors


I assumed the site was broken in safari but since the widths are different in the thumbnail as-well I guess it is supposed to look like that. Looks a bit awkward but I like it.
Having a link to download Firefox on a company website for someone else isn't very "professional" IMO.
and what's with all that designer info when you click on the link, "site by pixel studio." ??!!
They don't have their own website so they gotta advertise like that is their own site?!
Poor choice.
This isn't as bad of a site as the score reflects. I enjoyed the tan a lot and I thought the site communicated well. Would have used more serif fonts.
I really dislike the strange widths. Being different is often good and all, but this just doesn't work for me. I fail to see why this keeps getting such good recognition... That reservation form is hideous! (I usually love most of the sites featured on Stylegala. This one just isn't for me I guess.)
First, I will go with my positive thoughts about the site--I like the color scheme. It's very clean and professional. The navigation is well done.
Now to the negatives. I don't like the variable widths in the design either. It throws everything off and doesn't give the eye a sense of continuity. I also thought it was a bit odd to have so much information on the design company--but of course there may be a reason for it?
About the different widths:
I thought it was a nice addition, but there is something that could have been done to add more flow that would have tied it all together: If you notice the second and middle width that includes the header and navigation doesn't have a bottom. It seemingly has the same bottom as the div on top of it, which is the picture. It would have been a good idea, in my opinion, to have a bottom the same width and with rounded corners come out below the big header image. That way, it would have tied in nicer.
Otherwise, I don't think it's as bad as what everyone is saying.
I think if the different widths weren't so different maybe 5-10px it wouldn't be so awkward. Its not an ugly site but to me it looks like the site is broken or has messed up a box model hack.
fine, subtle, classy, don't see what's wrong with it
The site is OK, though I also feel it has an unfinished broken look, even though it was intended that way. As to the mention of Firefox and the design company, what is wrong with that? There's just a page about the contacts of the design company, like the Credits page, which is perfectly OK. Concerning Firefox, it's great they're promoting it! So what if it's a company site? Can't a company endorse a particular browser? Or, more accurately, can't a company say "Look, this modern site views well in this modern browser". Again, good on them for promoting Firefox. I put "Get Firefox" link on all of my designed sites. It doesn't stand out enough to look unprofessional, yet it does advertise this great browser to viewers.
It is a very decent attempt to CSS-based design from a Turkish designer in Turkey where everything is still in tables and very small group of designers talk about web standards.
Also, it is very different than most CSS based sites that I've seen. When I saw this site very first time, I thought "oh no, a cruel joke of the box model problem" but I've noticed that the designer did this intentionally. I think it looks really good. It takes your eyes directly to the banner-like picture at the top the page. I bet most sites with same width boxes, your eyes wouldn’t go there first. Once you look at the picture, you want to stay there. (at least I want to :)
Use of colors, photos, navigation elements are really nice. I hope we will see more of very talented Turkish designers design with CSS.
The site didn't impress me.
First if all, I'd agree about the different-width issue — at least the designer needed to introduce some details that would somehow support this division.
And none of the flash-banners that are supposed to be splash-images on the sites work in MacOS X — neither in Safari, nor in FireFox. It does however work in Opera.
In safari and firefox for mac you have a problem, on the top side, in the language box where is writting turce.I like the ideea of a big image header.It's looking good.
Villa holidays and holiday villas with private pools to rent with Villas to Go.