Stylegala news / June 2006 / FTSE 100 Websites fail Accessibility Requirements
FTSE 100 Websites fail Accessibility Requirements
Research conducted by user experience company Nomensa, shows that almost 75% of businesses in the FTSE 100 list of companies fail to meet the minimum requirements for website accessibility. The homepages of each website were measured and evaluated, using manual testing, against the globally recognised Web Content Accessibility Guidelines* (WCAG).
23 jun at 10:49 by simon
There are 7 guest comments so far.
Search the archive
Stylegala news archive
- July 2008 [6]
- June 2008 [46]
- May 2008 [5]
- April 2008 [5]
- March 2008 [3]
- February 2008 [4]
- January 2008 [7]
- December 2007 [3]
- November 2007 [8]
- October 2007 [17]
- September 2007 [12]
- August 2007 [12]
- July 2007 [12]
- June 2007 [11]
- May 2007 [25]
- April 2007 [17]
- March 2007 [19]
- February 2007 [19]
- January 2007 [23]
- December 2006 [15]
- November 2006 [23]
- October 2006 [39]
- September 2006 [29]
- August 2006 [50]
- July 2006 [38]
- June 2006 [29]
- May 2006 [27]
- April 2006 [50]
- March 2006 [38]
- February 2006 [38]
- January 2006 [65]
- December 2005 [45]
- November 2005 [41]
- October 2005 [44]
- September 2005 [46]
- August 2005 [42]
- July 2005 [32]
- June 2005 [36]
- May 2005 [55]
- April 2005 [50]
- March 2005 [37]
- February 2005 [65]
- January 2005 [94]
- December 2004 [61]
- November 2004 [67]
- October 2004 [12]
- September 2004 [1]
Public news archive
- July 2008 [22]
- June 2008 [115]
- May 2008 [126]
- April 2008 [77]
- March 2008 [69]
- February 2008 [80]
- January 2008 [72]
- December 2007 [35]
- November 2007 [54]
- October 2007 [66]
- September 2007 [51]
- August 2007 [65]
- July 2007 [58]
- June 2007 [68]
- May 2007 [87]
- April 2007 [75]
- March 2007 [65]
- February 2007 [62]
- January 2007 [68]
- December 2006 [52]
- November 2006 [51]
- October 2006 [73]
- September 2006 [52]
- August 2006 [85]
- July 2006 [57]
- June 2006 [67]
- May 2006 [103]
- April 2006 [77]
- March 2006 [93]
- February 2006 [99]
- January 2006 [111]
- December 2005 [104]
- November 2005 [83]
- October 2005 [125]
- September 2005 [106]
- August 2005 [94]
- July 2005 [103]
- June 2005 [79]
- May 2005 [79]
- April 2005 [65]
- March 2005 [47]
- February 2005 [35]
- January 2005 [22]
- December 2004 [31]
- November 2004 [37]
News contributors
Features
- Stylegala BookStore
- The Stylegala BookStore has a massive archive of great books for you as a professional..
- Bullet madness
- Bullet madness is a list of 200 bullets, arrows and icons uploaded by our users.
- CSS Reference
- An alphabetical list over the most common CSS1 and CSS2 syntax and properties.
Sponsors
Interesting. So I wonder if someone is doing research on accessibility of fortune 500 companies now.
Anyone else find it ironic that there's an ordered list on that page, the second item being "Poor use of lists" - and it's marked up with <br>s...instead of a list? (Not to mention the rest of the generally horrendous HTML).
Anyway, I thought it was ironic. Still kind of interesting even though it really isn't surprising.
I think the Nomensa needs to reach out more to the web designers/developers as they're the ones on the front-lines and are most equipped to make these fast and sometimes easy changes.
What I am tired of seeing is this constant harping of accessibility of corp websites. An organizations' accessibility should be viewed holistically. I'm sure many of their retail stores aren't accessible either (doorway widths, ramps, restrooms, ATMs, TTY phonelines). Now its a question of what/where should they prioritize their efforts.
Once they're sold on accessbility in general, the website is sure to benefit.
These reports come out every few months, and have done for 2-3 years, and guess what!? Nothing has changed.
They're a lame publicity tool and have yet to effect any real change.
I thought it was funny that they were publishing an article about usability and their site didn't even contain a doctype.
no doctype - they are hypocrites
accessibility is important
Add a comment:
Keep the comment relevant, constructive and be polite.
A valid email address or URL to your site must be provided, or the comment might get deleted. Content seemed inappropriate or offensive may be edited and/or deleted. Avoid explicit language and words such as "sucks" and "ripoff". For more in-depth discussions use our forum. Email addresses are never displayed. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted - no need to use <p> or <br/>. Quotes & apostrophes are automatically converted to smart punctuation. Be careful when copying and pasting portions of entries or other comments. The following inline HTML elements may be used: <strong><em><pre><q><blockquote><code>. All other code will get removed before posting. Don't forget to close your tags.