Stylegala news / September 2006 / No more Transitional DOCTYPEs, please
No more Transitional DOCTYPEs, please
The phasing out of Transitional DOCTYPEs is long overdue - they are called Transitional for a reason.
26 sep at 16:46 by Roger
There is one guest comment so far.
Search the archive
Stylegala news archive
- July 2008 [6]
- June 2008 [46]
- May 2008 [5]
- April 2008 [5]
- March 2008 [3]
- February 2008 [4]
- January 2008 [7]
- December 2007 [3]
- November 2007 [8]
- October 2007 [17]
- September 2007 [12]
- August 2007 [12]
- July 2007 [12]
- June 2007 [11]
- May 2007 [25]
- April 2007 [17]
- March 2007 [19]
- February 2007 [19]
- January 2007 [23]
- December 2006 [15]
- November 2006 [23]
- October 2006 [39]
- September 2006 [29]
- August 2006 [50]
- July 2006 [38]
- June 2006 [29]
- May 2006 [27]
- April 2006 [50]
- March 2006 [38]
- February 2006 [38]
- January 2006 [65]
- December 2005 [45]
- November 2005 [41]
- October 2005 [44]
- September 2005 [46]
- August 2005 [42]
- July 2005 [32]
- June 2005 [36]
- May 2005 [55]
- April 2005 [50]
- March 2005 [37]
- February 2005 [65]
- January 2005 [94]
- December 2004 [61]
- November 2004 [67]
- October 2004 [12]
- September 2004 [1]
Public news archive
- July 2008 [16]
- June 2008 [115]
- May 2008 [126]
- April 2008 [77]
- March 2008 [69]
- February 2008 [80]
- January 2008 [72]
- December 2007 [35]
- November 2007 [54]
- October 2007 [66]
- September 2007 [51]
- August 2007 [65]
- July 2007 [58]
- June 2007 [68]
- May 2007 [87]
- April 2007 [75]
- March 2007 [65]
- February 2007 [62]
- January 2007 [68]
- December 2006 [52]
- November 2006 [51]
- October 2006 [73]
- September 2006 [52]
- August 2006 [85]
- July 2006 [57]
- June 2006 [67]
- May 2006 [103]
- April 2006 [77]
- March 2006 [93]
- February 2006 [99]
- January 2006 [111]
- December 2005 [104]
- November 2005 [83]
- October 2005 [125]
- September 2005 [106]
- August 2005 [94]
- July 2005 [103]
- June 2005 [79]
- May 2005 [79]
- April 2005 [65]
- March 2005 [47]
- February 2005 [35]
- January 2005 [22]
- December 2004 [31]
- November 2004 [37]
News contributors
Features
- Stylegala BookStore
- The Stylegala BookStore has a massive archive of great books for you as a professional..
- Bullet madness
- Bullet madness is a list of 200 bullets, arrows and icons uploaded by our users.
- CSS Reference
- An alphabetical list over the most common CSS1 and CSS2 syntax and properties.
Sponsors
I wholeheartedly agree. Far too many people use the Transitional DOCTYPEs for my taste. I usually use XHTML 1.0 Strict because I've found a few bugs with XHTML 1.1. (I'll probably stick with XHTML 1.0 Strict until some of the axed features are replaced in CSS.)
However, I think another key issue is that XHTML should be rendered as XHTML, or at least XML. I'm sure I'm not the first to figure this out, but I've found out a way to get Safari, Internet Explorer, and Mozilla to parse XML at the same time (click my URL for more info). Maybe if we can get more people to use XML, it will enforce valid code and get rid of half the problem.
I'd rather see websites that validate Transitional than a whole bunch that are Strict and don't validate.
Add a comment:
Keep the comment relevant, constructive and be polite.
A valid email address or URL to your site must be provided, or the comment might get deleted. Content seemed inappropriate or offensive may be edited and/or deleted. Avoid explicit language and words such as "sucks" and "ripoff". For more in-depth discussions use our forum. Email addresses are never displayed. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted - no need to use <p> or <br/>. Quotes & apostrophes are automatically converted to smart punctuation. Be careful when copying and pasting portions of entries or other comments. The following inline HTML elements may be used: <strong><em><pre><q><blockquote><code>. All other code will get removed before posting. Don't forget to close your tags.