Skip to Content


Public news / March 2006 / Standards, bah!

Standards, bah!

The Society of Graphic Designers of Canada say "whatever" to web standards in their 2005 annual report.

permanent link 14 mar at 23:41 by Scott

There are 7 guest comments so far.

commentat 23:50 on 14 March 2006, G3 wrote:

Couldn't help but notice it is the society of "Graphic Designers" and not "Web Developers/ Designers." There is a huge difference in the school of thought between the two.

I really hate having to fix a graphic designers product here at work.

commentat 00:34 on 15 March 2006, Phil Renaud wrote:

Nothing wrong with using tables for tabular data.

commentat 00:43 on 15 March 2006, Steve wrote:

Lets not label all Canadians as standards-hating eskimoes. I mean, I've never even heard of such a society.

commentat 05:45 on 15 March 2006, Scott wrote:

Obviously tabular data for tables is just fine, that's what it was meant for. Not for layout - and while quote can be interpreted differently, I get the sense the GDC is advocating a "change is bad" sort of mentality whether CSS is the future or not.

commentat 17:17 on 15 March 2006, Nico wrote:

Yes it's the Society of Graphic Designers. And they beleive that Web Design is within their realm of ability.

So the differing school of thought is that, Graphic Designers think that designing web pages ends at appearance, and web designers/developers think (correctly I might add) that Graphic Designers can't design web sites properly.

commentat 19:03 on 15 March 2006, Paul wrote:

There's a cool little article over Design Observer here:

http://www.designobserver.com/archives/012078.html#more

Said article take Google's logo as an example of anti-design, and then goes on to discuss how un-designed Google is in general.

Which is where I sat back and thought, "But Google's *well* designed!". Simple aesthetic, by amazing information design, hiding the entirety of Google's applications behind one simple text field.

I don't think print designers would get it.

commentat 17:31 on 16 March 2006, David B. wrote:

I disagree Nico I am a graphic/web designer and i do 'get it' what i have seen for a long time is that web designers ( usually more developers ) dont 'get' graphic design thus their designs lack asthetically.

I for one would rather think of myself as a bridge in that gap and i think more people are moving toward that bridge. dont simply discount graphic designers and write them off as wanna be web designers.

if you want graphic designers to 'get' web desginer correctly then coax them into the fold, not dismiss them.

Add a comment:

(required, non-public)

  |  Chars left: 1000

Keep the comment relevant, constructive and be polite.
A valid email address or URL to your site must be provided, or the comment might get deleted. Content seemed inappropriate or offensive may be edited and/or deleted. Avoid explicit language and words such as "sucks" and "ripoff". For more in-depth discussions use our forum. Email addresses are never displayed. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted - no need to use <p> or <br/>. Quotes & apostrophes are automatically converted to smart punctuation. Be careful when copying and pasting portions of entries or other comments. The following inline HTML elements may be used: <strong><em><pre><q><blockquote><code>. All other code will get removed before posting. Don't forget to close your tags.


Search the archive

Stylegala news archive

Public news archive

News contributors


Features

Stylegala BookStore
The Stylegala BookStore has a massive archive of great books for you as a professional..
Bullet madness
Bullet madness is a list of 200 bullets, arrows and icons uploaded by our users.
CSS Reference
An alphabetical list over the most common CSS1 and CSS2 syntax and properties.

Sponsors

Logo design for $149

Advertise here